The strike’s demands go past the economist limits

The strike had two types of demands that addressed conditions for teachers and students. OUSD is one of the lowest paid districts in the Bay Area, had difficulty recruiting and retaining teachers, teachers and staff could not afford the cost of living in the areas where they worked, schools with the largest population of low-income Black, Brown, Indigenous, disabled/special needs students had the most unmet needs, had unhoused families & deteriorated School Building/physical plan.

One teacher said, “the school’s buildings are old and in need of renovation, that there’s lead in the soil and a rat and mice infestation in the classrooms, and that they’re concerned about lead in the water.” Years of school closings in these neighborhoods, Charter school privatization and Real Estate Profit-motivated displacement had increased these disparities and overcrowding.

1) Education workers address economic gains for the workers: wages, hours, benefits, retroactive payment for frozen wages, $5,000 signing bonus, more support staff such as Nurses, librarians, Councilors; especially needed for the most marginalized students and underfunded schools. OUSD whined about a cost of $70 million (ABC 7 News, 5/15).

2) “Common Good” demands expressing class solidarity:  four were covered in Memorandums of Agreements (MOUs) which addressed the most marginalized students: a) School property used for unhoused and housing insecure students, b) shared governance for community schools, c) support for Historically Black Schools, and d) processes for school closures (CNN, 5/15).